Scott Styris is avoiding it for more success in his batting. Does it really matter anyways? No, not Styris' batting, but footwork in modern day cricket. Styris decided to cut down on his footwork to allow him to be more balanced when striking the ball and it gave him instant success.
But for how long Scott?
Well, having good balance while hitting the ball is obviously good, no one will disagree, but isn't that what footwork is meant to provide? Balance while playing your shots? I mean footwork is not just about reaching to the pitch of the ball, otherwise no one would have played on the back foot. I think good footwork itself enables one to have a greater balance while playing shots.
Some might disagree sighting the most recent example of Sehwag. Now I am not going to say that Sehwag achieves that balance because of his good footwork, but he does it inspite of it only because he has exemplary hand-eye coordination. Ganguly had a divine touch in his early days owing to this very attribute.
Someone like Sehwag won't need footwork when he is young. But it will start to matter once that hand eye coordination starts to fade with age, like I am afraid has happened with Ganguly. Its more difficult for these type of batsmen to come out of a loss of form, which is inevitable over a period of time.
A Dravid or Tendulkar can work their way into form using their footwork like Sachin did in sydney to come out of a longish loss of form. Sachin could cope with his loss of hand eye coordination with aging only because he has a decent foorwork. Infact he is still coming to terms with it, but he certainly has the technique to cope with it.
I fear when ever Sehwag loses this touch with age, his career is going to go only downwards from that point on, much like Ganguly's. Sehwag still has a better all round batting capabilities, so probably he would have achieved more than what Ganguly has (atleast in Test Cricket), but it is improbable that he reaches the tier of a Tendulkar or Dravid.
Contrary to what Styris feels, most successful batsmen in world cricket have had decent footwork. If you look at the top three or four batsmen in this era - Sachin, Lara, Ponting and Dravid no one will disagree that they have good footwork and they do achieve good balance with it.
Gavaskar and Boycott will definitely agree :)
But for how long Scott?
Well, having good balance while hitting the ball is obviously good, no one will disagree, but isn't that what footwork is meant to provide? Balance while playing your shots? I mean footwork is not just about reaching to the pitch of the ball, otherwise no one would have played on the back foot. I think good footwork itself enables one to have a greater balance while playing shots.
Some might disagree sighting the most recent example of Sehwag. Now I am not going to say that Sehwag achieves that balance because of his good footwork, but he does it inspite of it only because he has exemplary hand-eye coordination. Ganguly had a divine touch in his early days owing to this very attribute.
Someone like Sehwag won't need footwork when he is young. But it will start to matter once that hand eye coordination starts to fade with age, like I am afraid has happened with Ganguly. Its more difficult for these type of batsmen to come out of a loss of form, which is inevitable over a period of time.
A Dravid or Tendulkar can work their way into form using their footwork like Sachin did in sydney to come out of a longish loss of form. Sachin could cope with his loss of hand eye coordination with aging only because he has a decent foorwork. Infact he is still coming to terms with it, but he certainly has the technique to cope with it.
I fear when ever Sehwag loses this touch with age, his career is going to go only downwards from that point on, much like Ganguly's. Sehwag still has a better all round batting capabilities, so probably he would have achieved more than what Ganguly has (atleast in Test Cricket), but it is improbable that he reaches the tier of a Tendulkar or Dravid.
Contrary to what Styris feels, most successful batsmen in world cricket have had decent footwork. If you look at the top three or four batsmen in this era - Sachin, Lara, Ponting and Dravid no one will disagree that they have good footwork and they do achieve good balance with it.
Gavaskar and Boycott will definitely agree :)
View comments